Tuesday, January 25, 2011

First Blog Assignment

George Orwell made many great points in his "Politics and the English Language" (1946) essay. I was captivated by his simple, clear, easy to understand everyday language. The fact that he was able to draw in my attention, and give me many great examples of his point about bad writing (that I totally agreed with) proves he was a wonderful communicator of the English language. He had me nodding my head and laughing loudly at some of the absurd examples of bad writing that were written by people with respectable titles and positions. I loved his point about them being too lazy to actually figure out what the words meant. I can't tell you how many times I've listened to political "double speak" and felt like I was being bamboozled. But, because I perceived them as being someone with an overall higher ranking in life, I was left feeling inadequate and bewildered. Now I understand that this form of language is meant to confuse and quiet those of us who would like real answers to our questions. What about those who use bad language skills to cover up their own ineptness? To me, that is just sad. If that's all they can muster, I give those prideful enough to hide their ignorance with meaningless words a pass. They probably don't sleep well at night anyway. Let's all be who we are, be honest about what we say, and try to say it plain English (so we don't need a lawyer for interpretation). I believe Orwell was right when he said the English language is in trouble. Too much dishonesty, too many cover ups. I also believe he was right in saying that clear thinking "is the next step to political regeneration" (para.2). Surely clear thinking leads to clear understanding, and a natural outgrowth of that would be clear communication. I don't think all politicians hide behind bad language. I do believe some of them who are less ethical and misguided use it as protection against their dishonest motives, giving them time to figure out their next move or vote. I also agree with Orwells contention that this problem is reversible. Orwells essay has inspired me to pay attention to the way I communicate. I appreciate knowing that smaller words are best, and that many words are not better, but simply too many.

1 comment:

  1. I certainly enjoyed reading your blog. Just as you mentioned about George Orwell’s writings being simple, clear, and easy to read, I felt that your blog was just as easy to read and understand. Your thoughts on political “double speak,” and the overall language in general were expressed very clearly. You even through in some highly technical terms such as “bamboozled,” I loved it. The expression “those prideful enough to hide their ignorance with meaningless words,” that you used was well placed in regards to the content, and what a great quote. Although I do believe that there are many occasions where the ones using the meaningless words are playing on the ignorance of those to whom they are delivering the message. If the general public was more aware and informed on the news, economy, and political discussions, it would go a long way in exposing some of the rhetoric.
    I believe the point that you made about the use of language by some to buy out more time for decisions to be made was very accurate. On a daily basis vague statements, or statements filled with meaningless jargon, are used to test the political temperature on a particular matter. A follow up statement with increasing clarity is more than likely to be made right after the latest polls have been reported.
    Well done Rene, I look forward to your next blog.

    ReplyDelete